The Board of the Fund for responding to Loss and Damage (FRLD) will hold its seventh meeting (B.7) on 7-9 October 2025 in the Philippines, the host country of the Board. This Board meeting is expected to be a pivotal moment for the Fund that will move it one step closer to full operationalization ahead of COP30.
At its last meeting (B.6), the Board began initial discussions to operationalize the “Barbados Implementation Modalities” (BIM), the Fund’s start-up phase with an initial allocation of USD 250 million. The BIM may allocate USD 5 to 20 million to activities, projects, or programmes for eligible activities for responding to loss and damage (L&D. It will support bottom-up, country-led, and country-owned approaches that promote and strengthen national responses to L&D.
Discussions at B.6 focused on a framing proposal for eligible activities and funding criteria, as well as a proposal for a project/programme cycle for the BIM. Due to concerns that the proposal would lead to significant barriers for developing countries to submit proposals to the Fund given the extensive and complex list of proposed elements, the matter was deferred to B.7.
There are significant expectations for B.7, including the adoption of the policies that will allow developing countries to begin accessing resources from the Fund in 2026.
The Board is tasked with developing various modalities to facilitate countries’ access to the Fund’s resources. For the BIM, these may include:
The Board is expected to define how these access modalities will be operationalized for the BIM at B.7, including options for possible arrangements for direct access via direct budget support, and which entities previously accredited by other funds will be able to initially implement projects or programmes with the FRLD.
According to the provisional agenda, the Board will have to decide upon the following at B.7:
A call for proposals would be launched shortly after B.7 if the Board reaches agreement on the policies that will operationalize the BIM. Developing countries must designate a national authority (NDA) or national focal point to the FRLD, based on the guidance adopted by the Board at B.6. All funding requests will have to be officially submitted to the Secretariat by the NDA.
A strong outcome at B.7 will be crucial for the Board to show significant progress towards the operationalization of the Fund at COP30. This would include an agreement by the Board on the eligible activities, simplified funding criteria, the project/programme cycle, an established modality to operationalize direct budget support, an agreed list of accredited entities eligible to implement projects under the BIM, and the launching of the long-term resource mobilization strategy.
1. https://www.nature.com/articles/s43017-024-00565-7
Elena Pereira is the lead negotiator for Honduras and one of the lead negotiators for AILAC on climate finance. She has over 10 years of experience in international development, working with government and international cooperation agencies on climate change mitigation and adaptation actions. As a climate finance advisor, she is currently supporting the Honduran government in the development of the national climate finance policy in the context of the country’s Nationally Determined Contributions and National Adaptation Plan. Ms. Pereira holds an MSc in Carbon Finance from the University of Edinburgh.
The Board of the Fund for responding to Loss and Damage (FRLD) will hold its seventh meeting (B.7) on 7-9 October 2025 in the Philippines, the host country of the Board. This Board meeting is expected to be a pivotal moment for the Fund that will move it one step closer to full operationalization ahead of COP30.
At its last meeting (B.6), the Board began initial discussions to operationalize the “Barbados Implementation Modalities” (BIM), the Fund’s start-up phase with an initial allocation of USD 250 million. The BIM may allocate USD 5 to 20 million to activities, projects, or programmes for eligible activities for responding to loss and damage (L&D. It will support bottom-up, country-led, and country-owned approaches that promote and strengthen national responses to L&D.
Discussions at B.6 focused on a framing proposal for eligible activities and funding criteria, as well as a proposal for a project/programme cycle for the BIM. Due to concerns that the proposal would lead to significant barriers for developing countries to submit proposals to the Fund given the extensive and complex list of proposed elements, the matter was deferred to B.7.
There are significant expectations for B.7, including the adoption of the policies that will allow developing countries to begin accessing resources from the Fund in 2026.
The Board is tasked with developing various modalities to facilitate countries’ access to the Fund’s resources. For the BIM, these may include:
The Board is expected to define how these access modalities will be operationalized for the BIM at B.7, including options for possible arrangements for direct access via direct budget support, and which entities previously accredited by other funds will be able to initially implement projects or programmes with the FRLD.
According to the provisional agenda, the Board will have to decide upon the following at B.7:
A call for proposals would be launched shortly after B.7 if the Board reaches agreement on the policies that will operationalize the BIM. Developing countries must designate a national authority (NDA) or national focal point to the FRLD, based on the guidance adopted by the Board at B.6. All funding requests will have to be officially submitted to the Secretariat by the NDA.
A strong outcome at B.7 will be crucial for the Board to show significant progress towards the operationalization of the Fund at COP30. This would include an agreement by the Board on the eligible activities, simplified funding criteria, the project/programme cycle, an established modality to operationalize direct budget support, an agreed list of accredited entities eligible to implement projects under the BIM, and the launching of the long-term resource mobilization strategy.