Filter by Partner

Thematic Areas

Just Transition

Research & Technical Papers

Case Study: The Nexus of Climate Change, Sovereign Debt, and Climate Finance in Ghana

research-and-technical-papers

SLYCAN Trust

Key sectors of Ghana's economy and society are vulnerable to the impacts of climate change, which are already causing significant loss and damage (L&D). At the same time, the country faces macroeconomic challenges that include a rising fiscal deficit and unsustainable debt. This case study illustrates the complex nexus of climate change, sovereign debt, and the global financial architecture, posing unique challenges for climate-vulnerable developing countries. On one hand, there is a need to invest in climate change adaptation and long-term resilience-building without adding to the existing debt burden and economic challenges; on the other hand, new and additional finance is also required to respond to climate-induced L&D that could otherwise lead to emergency borrowing when costs exceed available domestic budgets. The impacts of climate change on Ghana can become drivers of new debt, and existing debt can slow down or prevent ambitious climate action and resilience-building. To prevent a vicious cycle, it is crucial to understand these dynamics at the national as well as global level. Non-debt-inducing finance as well as innovative financial instruments and frameworks are necessary to effectively address climate change in developing countries and ensure key principles such as equity, justice, and common but differentiated responsibilities (CBDR). As a climate-vulnerable developing country now exiting its 2022 selective debt default, Ghana provides a real-life case study on challenges, dimensions, and solution pathways.

Policy Brief

Primer: Local-Level Access to Climate Finance for Adaptation and Loss and Damage

policy

SLYCAN Trust

In the face of intensifying climate change impacts and the urgent need for ambitious climate action, finance and other means of implementation have been identified as key enablers. However, many developing countries lack sufficient domestic resources to fully address the impacts of climate change on their territories, people, and economies, while global funds mostly target the regional or national level and may not reach the ground. While the impacts of climate change are already severely felt on the ground, accessing finance at the local level at the required scale and speed remains a challenge. This persists despite clear evidence documenting the specific needs of subnational actors, including communities, local governments, cities, and regions, in response to the changing climate. Particularly for those who are most vulnerable, investments into adaptation, resilience-building, and responding to loss and damage (L&D) are essential to protect human lives, livelihoods, health and wellbeing, social cohesion, and cultural heritage. Currently, there is a mismatch between these clear needs on the ground and the ability of sub-national actors to access climate finance. It is therefore vital to evaluate potential modalities for local access that could be operationalized by the new Fund for Responding to Loss and Damage (FRLD) as well as other global funds including the Green Climate Fund (GCF), Global Environment Facility (GEF), and Adaptation Fund. Building on stakeholder input and lessons learned from existing funds as well as other sectors (e.g., health, the humanitarian sector, or disaster risk management), this primer provides an overview of key aspects of local access to climate finance.

No items found.